In this repository, we’re exploring how to probe the ability of large language models (LLMs) to engage in practical deliberation. In the main notebook, we’re testing whether an LLM’s all-things-considered judgements in decision situations from the kellycyy/daily_dilemmas dataset are in fact insensitive to invariance transformations, such as strengthen the reasons in favor of the preferred options. We conceive of this as a proof of concept, which is meant to demonstrate the feasibility of a more comprehensive computational investigation; as work in progress, so feedback and contributions are welcome; as a preliminary experimental setup, which is meant to be adapted and extended for further research on practical deliberation in LLMs.